Hayphoto Pro For Mac

Posted : admin On 22.06.2019
Hayphoto Pro For Mac Average ratng: 8,6/10 6675 reviews

Find the latest Mac news from WIRED. See related science and technology articles, photos, slideshows and videos. Download photokey pro 6 for mac for free. Design & Photo downloads - PhotoKey 6 Pro by FXhome Limited and many more programs are available for instant and free download. Veescope Photo Keyer automatically removes the green screen from a photo.

With the, Apple is just trying to keep pace with the rest of the computing industry. The biggest upgrade is Intel's latest CPUs, which have been popping up in PCs since last fall. And there are some other slight hardware tweaks, too. Basically, it's a classic Apple refresh: Not much has changed.

Put the MacBook Pro side by side with last year's model and it's impossible to tell the difference. Still, if you're a committed Mac user, it's exactly what you've been waiting for. Everyone else should take a long, hard look at the competition.

Hardware The slim unibody aluminum case Apple introduced in 2016 is back, along with the Touch Bar, which is still a love-it-or-hate-it affair. The MacBook Pro is sleek and stylish even compared with thinner and lighter notebooks like HP's Spectre, but don't let that daintiness fool you: It still feels like a tough machine. We didn't expect Apple to change much, but it's still strange how little has evolved over the past two years. The MacBook Pro didn't need to get thinner, necessarily, but it would have been nice if the company had found a way to shave down the screen bezels. Apple made a big deal about the new keyboard, which has been refined to make typing quieter and less clicky.

You can hear a difference with the new hardware, but it's not exactly night and day. According to iFixit, the new silicone layer underneath the keys that makes them quieter could also protect them from dust and debris. So, really, this could also be a stealth fix for the previous MacBook keyboard issues that led to a class action lawsuit. Sure, Apple is fixing those old machines for free, but it still hasn't said how it's preventing future dust problems. For me, this upgrade isn't enough. I've never been a fan of Apple's flat butterfly switch keys, since they have no depth. If Microsoft can squeeze a decent amount of key travel out of the Surface keyboard cover, Apple has no excuse.

Instead, it seems more intent on trying to replicate the feeling of typing on an iOS virtual keyboard in the real world. We tested the 13-inch MacBook Pro, which features Apple's mainstay 2,560 x 1,600 Retina display. The resolution hasn't changed over the past few years, but at least the display can finally take advantage of Apple's True Tone technology, which made its debut on the iPad Pro, and which relies on an ambient light sensor to change the white balance of the screen and Touch Bar depending on your environment. That's meant to make screens appear more natural, as if you were looking at a piece of white paper. Again, we've seen it on iOS devices before, and it's helpful on the Mac in reducing screen fatigue. In more disappointing news, since the MacBook Pro has the same case as before, we're still stuck with four USB-C Thunderbolt 3 connections.

At least that seems less egregious than it did two years ago. You won't have to try too hard to find USB-C cables and accessories these days, but it would still be nice to have one traditional USB port and an SD card reader. That would be useful for creative workers who invested in expensive accessories and now have to lug around bundles of dongles. The Touch Bar is, well, the Touch Bar.

It's useful sometimes, but I still miss the reliability of physical function keys. The biggest upgrades are under the hood: Apple is finally using Intel's eighth-generation Core processors, which launched last year. The 13-inch model features quad-core i5 and i7 chips with Turbo Boost speeds up to 4.5GHz, while the 15-incher has six-core i7 and i9 processors that can reach 4.8GHz. The bigger model can also be configured with more elaborate hardware, including up to 32GB of RAM; a 4TB SSD; and dedicated Radeon Pro 560X graphics. In comparison, the 13-inch machine maxes out with 16GB of RAM; a 2TB SSD; and integrated Intel Iris Plus 655 graphics. Finally, the laptops feature Apple's T2 chip, which makes booting and file encryption more secure by bringing things like the audio and SSD controllers into a single location. It also lets you shout 'Hey Siri' to a Mac for the first time.

Voice commands work about as well as they do on the iPhone and iPad, but you'll have to shout if you're far from the computer. Unfortunately, Apple didn't add any far-field microphones to make it easier to talk to Siri from far away. That's a shame, since we're seeing it on Windows laptops like the. Siri also isn't very smart on Macs: If you have an iPhone nearby, she'll pop up on both devices and get confused whenever you shout a voice command. You could call these new MacBook Pros Apple's apology to prosumers. Sure, many of them would like their old ports back, or at least a card reader.

But the sheer amount of power makes them appealing upgrades. And it's about time: I've talked to plenty of Mac fans who were ready to jump ship to more versatile and capable Windows machines. The easiest way to break down the MacBook Pro's capabilities is with benchmarks. In Geekbench 4's multi-core test, our Core i7 13-inch model scored a whopping 18,837, as compared with around 15,200 from similarly specced machines last year. According to Geekbench's website comparisons, the MacBook Pro is almost 1,000 points faster than a 2013-era Mac Pro with a six-core Xeon processor. What all that really means is that if you're doing CPU-heavy work like video and audio editing, or compiling tons of code, you'll notice an improvement.

(We plan to test the 15-inch MacBook Pro soon.) Update: Apple for the CPU throttling issues on the new MacBook Pros after this review published. We've updated our review unit and haven't noticed any benchmark differences. Laptop Geekbench 4 CPU test (64-bit, single-/multi-core) Xbench MacBook Pro 2018 (13-inch, 2.3GHz-3.8GHz quad-core I7, 16GB RAM, Intel Iris Plus 655) 5,356/18,837 699.53 MacBook Pro 2016 (15-inch, 2.7GHz Core i7, 16GB RAM, 2GB Radeon Pro 455) 4,309/13,367 558.81 MacBook Pro 2016 (13-inch, 2.9GHz Core i5, 8GB RAM, Intel Iris Graphics 550) 3,876/7,504 476.36 MacBook Pro 2016 (13-inch, 2GHz Core i5, 8GB RAM, Intel Iris Graphics 540) 3,756/7,268 473.65 Unfortunately, we didn't have a Core i7-equipped MacBook Pro from last year to directly compare; just an i5 model. Jas 1.2.1 for mac. But we can still draw a few conclusions from the video conversion app HandBrake.

When we tried to transcode a 15-second 4K clip with the software's Super High Quality 1080p setting, the new MacBook Pro averaged an encoding speed of 7.5fps. Last year's i5 model, on the other hand, clocked 4.6fps. And in Cinebench, a popular cross-platform benchmark, the new MacBook Pro reached a score of 600, while the older one clocked in at 379. I was also surprised that I could play games decently on the new machine without lowering the screen resolution. Tacoma hovered between 30 and 35fps while playing at 2,560 by 1,600. You wouldn't mistake the 13-inch MacBook Pro for a gaming laptop, but at least you have the option of dipping your toes into something fun. Surface Book 2 (15-inch) 20:50 Surface Laptop 14:49 Surface Pro 13:40 Apple MacBook Pro 2018 (13-inch, Touch Bar) 12:25 Apple MacBook Pro 2016 (13-inch, no Touch Bar) 11:42 Surface Book (Core i7, discrete graphics) 11:31 / 3:02 (tablet only) Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) 11:23 Apple MacBook Pro 2016 (15-inch) 11:00 Apple MacBook Pro 2016 (13-inch, Touch Bar) 9:55 Dell XPS 13 (2018) 9:50 Another nice upgrade: Apple has rebounded with some decent battery performance.

Our laptop lasted 12 hours and 25 minutes in our standard battery test, which involves looping an HD video until it dies. That's a great jump forward from 2016, when it clocked just under 10 hours.

Pricing and the competition The 13-inch MacBook Pro with the Touch Bar starts at $1,799 with a Core i5 processor, 8GB of RAM and a 256GB SSD. It's worth bumping up your memory and storage, but it'll cost you an additional $400 to snag 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. If you're looking for a good deal, though, and you don't want the Touch Bar, there's still the entry-level MacBook Pro at $1,299.

The only problem is that it's stuck with a paltry 8GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. Though it's heavier, the 15-inch model is better suited to serious work. It starts at $2,399, but at least it gets you 16GB of RAM and dedicated Radeon 555X graphics. And if you're dealing with complex audio and video editing, you'll appreciate the larger screen. There's also, finally, an external graphics option specifically designed for Macs: the $699 BlackMagic eGPU.

It features AMD's Radeon RX580, which will speed up video encoding and let you play a few games. Outside of Apple devices, there are a ton of compelling PCs like Dell's XPS lineup and HP's Spectre. We're also looking forward to ASUS's ZenBook Pro, whose trackpad is actually a small touchscreen. That could just end up being a gimmick, but in theory it can do much more than the Touch Bar. If you've been a Mac loyalist for years, it's worth taking a look to see what else is out there.

Wrap-up While this latest generation of the MacBook Pro might seem understated, it's a more significant upgrade than last year's, when Apple just added some aging CPUs. These new models are more powerful than ever - though, if that's your main concern, you should probably lean toward the 15-inch model. But it's also clear that Apple has been falling a bit behind the competition, which has been offering the same CPUs and better graphics for months. It's clear that these machines are meant to appease Apple's fans, not win over new ones.

On May 17, AppleInsider paid a visit to the Consumer Reports offices and testing facility in Yonkers, N.Y., where at how the organization arrives at its conclusions about products. When we sat down with the Consumer Reports decision-makers, one of the topics of discussion was the organization's past assessments of Apple products, including a series of controversies involving individual conclusions about the 2016 MacBook Pro and the HomePod in early 2017. 'Biased for consumers' Everyone we spoke with at Consumer Reports adamantly denied that they have been unfair to Apple, arguing that their mission and methodology is entirely analytical and data-driven. Accusations of bias or unfairness to certain companies, a Consumer Reports spokesperson noted, is 'not a unique complaint.' In fact, there were times when Consumer Reports has been accused of bias in the other direction — of liking Apple and its products too much.

'We believe that we have certainly been fair when it comes to Apple products and we haven't treated them any differently than anyone else,' said Jennifer Shecter, CR's Senior Director, Content Impact & Corporate Outreach. 'We test more than 7,000 products and services every single year, and I deal with every company who has an issue and they say well, why do you like Apple so much more than you like my product.' Or you have other companies who say 'why don't you like mine.' ' 'But this not a question of preference,' said Shecter. 'This is a question of scientific evaluation and comparative testing.

It is not about preference, that does not come into play into our testing.' 'We treat every company and every product the same way.

And it's been like that since 1936,' Shecter added. 'We deal with Apple products and Apple as a company the same way we deal with every other company. Empirically speaking, we evaluate every product as it comes, and every piece of feedback from the manufacturer as it comes, and that is our process. So we have had robust dialogue with Apple, throughout the processes, and we are responsive to feedback that we get from companies, too.' According to Consumer Reports' director of communications Barrie Rosen, the organization currently recommends Apple products in the categories of smartwatches, smartphones, tablets, streaming media devices, smart speakers, laptops, and all-in-one desktop computers — just about every category in which Apple offers products.

As far as device usage goes, while touring Consumer Reports' offices, we did note that the desktop computers are PCs. However, we did see quite a few MacBooks on desks there, and when we met with the company personnel in a conference room, at least two had MacBooks in front of them. As for smartphones, we noticed about a 50/50 split between iPhones and Android devices in the offices. Apple and Consumer Reports As for Apple and Consumer Reports' relationship, they do have one, and judging by the team's comments about it, it's somewhere between cordial and cooperative. 'We have an ongoing dialogue with Apple,' Shecter said. 'Whenever we have a story that's coming out that we're going to call Apple out — just like we would any other manufacturer — we call them.

And when they have questions, we answer them. Consumer Reports' says that their direct dealings with Apple are with all sorts of different Apple personnel. Sometimes they talk to marketing people, sometimes product managers, and occasionally even engineers. 'It might start with a product manager,' Maria Rerecich, director of the electronics testing team, said.

'But we've often wind up in dialogue with the engineers on the product, because they have specific technical questions that they need to be asking and hearing our answers to. We'll go engineer-to-engineer at that point. Shecter added that the companies' communications are usually done over the phone and that in-person meetings with Apple are less common, mostly because the two companies are headquartered on opposite coasts. 'As we do, we invite manufacturers to come and visit our facility. We're always eager to go to other manufacturers' facilities,' she said. 'I think that when we've been in dialogue with them it's been good faith on both sides,' said Shecter.

'There have been times when we've had to be in constant contact if there's a story coming out, or if there's more stories coming out, but every time they have a question we answer their questions, truly, honestly, and responsively.' The MacBook Pro Story. One of those times dialog was needed was following the release of Consumer Reports assessment of the 2016 MacBook Pro. As AppleInsider reported in December of 2016, CR, upon the release of, declined to recommend the new product, the first time it didn't recommend the MacBook Pro. Its decision, following lengthy engagement with Apple and the release of a software fix. The problem, it turned out, was that Consumer Reports had turned off caching prior to running the test, leading to the exposure of a battery bug that Apple later fixed. Apple said in public comments at the time that this resetting was 'not a setting used by customers and does not reflect real-world usage.'

The team at Consumer Reports gave us their side of what happened in that product assessment. Their engagement with Apple involved extensive communications, over the Christmas holiday that year. 'We run battery life tests on laptops,' Maria Rerecich said. 'And the way we run the battery life test is, we are doing a website cycle over Wi-Fi. We don't run those live over Wi-Fi, we have a server with the webpages stored on it so it's consistent and our testing has to be the same from time to time. So we don't want to encounter the vagaries of someone's website being down. So we have the webpages stored, we run those over wi-fi from our server, to the test machines, and we're basically cycling through webpages.'

'We start with the computers fully charged, we set them all to the same brightness level, so again it's consistent across. So just let em run overnight, and then some, depending on how long they last,' added Rerecich. 'We log that recording, and basically once the laptop dies the watch stops, so we can tell exactly when it's petered out. We run that once, we record the results, and we run it a second time. We're looking for consistency within five or ten percent.' 'We set them up the same as much as possible, we go with default settings largely, but have turned the cache off, and the reason we turn the cache off is because we don't want the website to be sitting in cache on the machine because then it's not exercising properly,' Rerecich continued.

'In the case of the MacBook Pro, that year 2016, when we run the two trials of the same test, we might get 14 hours and 14.1 hours. We may get 16 hours and then 16.3 hours. If it's more than that 5 percent variation, we'll run it a third time and see where it falls. The case of the MacBook, we got 10 hours, then we got 4 hours. We never see a variation like that. This was completely unusual. And the numbers told us that there's something going on.

We were not able to evaluate that battery as a result, because what's the right number?' And we felt that based on that testing, there was something that was not explained, and we could not recommend the model as a result. We got in touch with Apple and we had a lot of back and forth with Apple.'

'We got in touch with them beforehand and asked them for a comment,' Shechter said. 'Because we said we're seeing this issue, and it's gonna impact our ability to recommend the product. And what they told us for the story was they didn't know why that would be.

They didn't understand why we were getting the results we were getting. So we asked them and they gave us a comment for the story. We published our story and then there had more questions about trying to figure out what the problem could be. So that was over Christmas, the year before last, and we probably talked to them every single day of that Christmas holiday.'

Eventually, CR gave their log of the test to Apple, who determined what had happened. 'Because you're doing it the way you are doing it, there's a bug being triggered in Safari,' Shechter said they were told by Apple. 'When you turn the cache off, this bug is being triggered. And while we respectfully disagree with you that this is a real-world test, or that this is the best indicator, they said you know, we want to make sure to them the recommendation seemed important, and so we went back and forth, and they decided to issue an update for the bug, and so they issued it, and we re-ran the tests, and it worked. So we were able to recommend it.'

Shechter added that CR's policy is that they will revisit product assessments after they have denied a recommendation for a specific reason, once the issue behind that reason has been fixed. But they will not retest products that have already been recommended. If they did that, she said, 'we'd be re-resting products all the time and we'd never even get to new products.' Consumer Reports sees the back and forth with Apple as an instance in which they and a manufacturer worked together to deliver a positive result for consumers.

The HomePod issue. Another rather contentious issue was Consumer Reports' assessment, this past February, of the HomePod speaker, ' Many, including AppleInsider, had taken issue with CR's determination that such competitors as the Sonos One and Google Home Max. Our editorial also questioned how Consumer Reports had reached some a determination in what appeared to be a single day.

CR that week, concluding with an invitation to visit their facilities. During that visit, the CR staffers further filled us in on what happened when they wrote about the HomePod. The assessment was, they said, a 'first look' —a collection of initial impressions of a product that Consumer Reports often publishes for certain high-profile products releases, including most iPhone and Galaxy devices. First look assessments will also sometimes take look at new, highly-touted features — such as the Face ID that debuted in the iPhone X — and also look at whether the product does certain things that it advertises doing. 'Because consumers will be very interested in a phone like that or a phone like the flagship Samsung phones or things of that nature, we will try to get results out the first day,' Recevich said. 'So we'll do this first look type of thing, with really big, important products that people are buzzing about.

Hayphoto Pro For Mac Free

Because consumers want to know, with Consumer Reports- everyone else is talking about it, why aren't you talking about it? So that's why we did that for the HomePod —not because it was Apple, but because these are the types of products that people are interested in —when the Apple Watch first came out, we did that.

But we do it for other products as well. 'Because the HomePod was sort of a hot product and we knew a lot of people were interested in what it was like and how it was. We did what was called a first look,' Recevich continued.

'In this case it wasn't a rented sample because we didn't have that available, but the first day we got them in, we did some testing, so that we could give an impression about it.' The first looks are usually presented as 'early test results.'

Consumer Reports has published day-of-release first looks of, the, and the. CR does not appear to have published first looks upon the releases of the Sonos One or Google Home Max.

'Typically on a first day, those first looks that we do, we'll get the product in, we'll rush it into the lab.' Said Rerecich. 'We'll do the testing that we'll accomplish on the first day, and then we're gonna get together with editorial and talk about what we saw, what the results were, we'll ask questions, and we'll refine what that first day story is about.' 'We did a listening test. We actually ran through our entire audio quality evaluation that day, and that was the basis of the first look, along with how it is to work with, and things like that.' Amplified Rerecich. 'It was just comparing the one column, which I believe is all we did on the first day.

Whereas the ranges that came out, combined everything else. For a speaker like that, the sound quality is the highest-weighted, it's the most important, and the other ones affected it. So, the ranking that came out in the ratings could have been slightly different from that first day, because that first day was just one component of the test.

Rerecich added that testing is not just about sound quality for speakers, but also about ease of use, features, and overall versatility. Following those evaluations, the full report is issued. Jerry Beilinson, Consumer Reports' content development team leader and electronics editor for the Consumer Reports magazine, argued that the assessment, written by CR's Allen St. John, wasn't actually all that negative. 'Very good sound, far better than most other speakers, one of the best.

Hayphoto pro for mac download

The argument seems to be that we said it wasn't the best speaker that was ever released. It's recommended, it got a very good rating, and was with very similar rating numbers, edged out by two similarly high-end competitors.' A question of aesthetics The Consumer Reports officials did point out one thing: Their testing process does not, formally, take into account the look and aesthetics of the product. And design, it should go without saying, is something historically very important to Apple.

'We don't care much about aesthetics,' Mark Connelly, director of testing said during our tour of the facilities. 'We'll describe them sometimes,' said Rerecich.

'Maybe for a washing machine that's not so important, but for something like a speaker that you might have in your living room, you might care what it looks like. We don't rate it and say this one looks better than that one,' unless it's unusual in some way.' 'Just to be clear, those are not part of the numerical rating, they don't get calculated as part of it,' said Jerry Beilinson. 'What Consumer Reports can do for you is give you comparisons you can't make yourself and judgments you can't easily make yourself. So when you're in the store, what is the performance in terms of speed of this laptop? Well I'm not going to look at it or read the spec but and necessarily know what is the battery life if a consumer is looking at a product they can tell whether they like the way it looks, they don't really need ConsumerReports or another outside authority to tell them whether they think the blue one or red one is better-looking.' 'That's not a way in which a consumer might be lacking in information they need to make the purchase,' said Beilinson.

'What we're really trying to do, primarily, is fill consumers in with information that they need to be able to make good choices.' One side or another We appreciate that Consumer Reports opened their doors to discuss testing methodology, making the entire process a little more transparent. Based on our commenters, AppleInsider readers and car aficionados have had a trust issue. Trust, once lost, is hard to regain. In the case of the 'antennagate,' the public-facing information was about the signal attenuation when the phone was held, with the rest of the story behind a paywall. A paywall is any publication's right, as bills do have to get paid, but the information that was propagated wasn't the whole story —as the group did recommend the iPhone in that paid report. With the 2016 MacBook Pro, Apple's declarations on the matter, and Consumer Reports still differ.

CR has clarified its stance on the matter to us now, and Apple has not beyond it being not a consumer setting —so the whole story for users is somewhere in between. We still feel that this should have been addressed with Apple before publication of the initial test results, though. Regarding the more recent HomePod and the audio comparison, AppleInsider still believes that the comparison the same day that the product was released wasn't handled well at all. Additionally, while an analysis in a vacuum of a product can be done rapidly, we do not believe that any kind of meaningful comparison between complex products like the HomePod and Google Home Max that Consumer Reports aims to do can be completed from start to publication in a matter of hours. This all said, there are a few things we conclude from our visit to Consumer Reports. Having viewed their testing process and met with their team, we are confident that they do not harbor a purposeful anti-Apple agenda, nor is there any sort of conspiracy against Apple afoot behind the CR walls. Their complete testing and evaluation process is conducted with integrity and in good faith.

Hayphoto Pro For Mac Download

However, there may very well be something about CR's analytical, numbers-driven process that clashes with the design-heavy Apple ethos, and makes their conclusions about Apple products different from those of more traditional reviewers. Even so, this hasn't stopped them from recommending most of Apple's lineup.